Document Type

Honors Project

Comments

Honors Project, Department of International Studies, Macalester College, April 2026. Committee: Ahmed I. Samatar (Macalester, advisor), David Chioni Moore (Macalester), Kathryn Linn Geurts (Hamline).

Abstract

Standard development theory holds that recovery requires institutions first: courts, fiscal systems, the rule of law. Rwanda in 1994 had none—and rebuilt a state. The state must extract to build capacity, deliver to build legitimacy; when both collapse simultaneously, no entry point remains. Somalia's three-decade failure confirms the trap. Rwanda broke it.

This thesis argues that Rwanda's trajectory is not an exception to the good governance consensus but a refutation of it. Through analytical synthesis of the existing scholarship on four post-genocide institutional mechanisms— gacaca community courts, umuganda collective labor, imihigo performance contracts, and ingando political education camps—the thesis develops five interlocking concepts. Convergent impossibility names the structural trap of simultaneous prerequisite collapse that sequential development theory cannot address. Paradox-breaking mechanisms identifies institutional innovations combining simultaneity, substitution, and self-reinforcement to generate capacity where none existed. Negotiation-based capacity reframes state capacity itself—away from Weberian bureaucratic coherence toward the strategic navigation of contradictory demands. Constitutive ambiguity designates the gray zones in which coercion and consent, extraction and provision, became structurally indistinguishable—not as failures of institutional design but as the medium through which governance actually occurred. Bidirectionality, derived from the Rwanda-Somalia-Ethiopia comparison, specifies the boundary condition separating governance from predation: the gray zone must deliver to both state and citizens.

The thesis closes with a sustainability paradox: the features that enabled Rwanda's achievement—personalized authority, emergency legitimacy, substitution of community knowledge for institutional independence—may prevent the governance form's reproduction under ordinary conditions. Drawing on the Qin–Han transition in Chinese political history as structural analogy, the thesis frames Rwanda's future not as a question of whether Kagame's institutions will survive his departure but whether their legitimacy framework can be replaced while their administrative architecture endures. The answer, the thesis argues, belongs to political choices not yet made by people not yet in power.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

© Copyright is owned by author of this document